Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Legal Immigrants, Illegal Aliens, and Their Progeny Increase Healthcare Costs

Like virtually every issue that faces the nation, our healthcare problem is greatly exacerbated by mass immigration—both legal and illegal.
A total of 43 percent of non-citizens lack health insurance, compared to just 12.7 percent of native-born Americans. These uninsured immigrants impose huge strains on our healthcare system that helped create the crisis we currently face.
Plenty of analysts and commentators have exposed how illegal aliens will receive healthcare under ObamaCare. They point out that while the House version of the plan, H.R. 3200, claims to prohibit illegal aliens from receiving benefits, the Democrats repeatedly blocked amendments that would screen for the illegals. It is estimated that 6.6 million illegal aliens will be eligible for public healthcare if the bill passes. Those who support this healthcare bill are essentially supporting a bill that, together with all of our country’s other obligations, will bankrupt the federal government and debase our currency.
This is an outrage for hardworking Americans, but I’d like to focus on two other important but largely ignored aspects of our immigration crisis that will cost taxpayers billions of dollars if Obama’s healthcare boondoggle is passed.
The first is birthright citizenship. The 14th Amendment of the Constitution states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
The Amendment was passed for the sole purpose of granting freed slaves and their children citizenship. Senator Jacob Merritt Howard of Michigan who introduced the Amendment stated that it “will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States.”
But the obvious intent, as well as the “subject to jurisdiction thereof” clause, is ignored by federal policy that gives children of illegal aliens born in the United States automatic citizenship.
What does this have to do with the healthcare debate? Under H.R. 3200, only one family member needs to be eligible for government healthcare. After that, the whole family can get free healthcare. The Congressional Research Service acknowledged,
There could be instances where some family members would meet the definition of an eligible individual for purposes of the credit, while other family members would not… H.R. 3200 does not expressly address how such a situation would be treated. Therefore, it appears that the Health Choices Commissioner would be responsible for determining how the credits would be administered in the case of mixed-status families.
This means that if a family of illegal aliens has one child after they arrive, their “anchor baby,” a U.S. citizen, could make the entire family eligible for tax-funded healthcare. This would likely incite public opposition, but it’s easy to imagine where Obama’s handpicked “health czar” would come down on the issue. Just look at the interpretation of the 14th amendment that allows instant citizenship to the offspring of illegal aliens. Look at the gross failures of past and present Administrations to secure our borders and pursue vigorous and continuous internal enforcement using E-verify.
Another problem that makes the healthcare bill problematic is our policy of legal immigration. America annually accepts approximately one million legal immigrants in addition to the flood of illegal aliens. Most of these immigrants come through the process of chain migration, whereby legal immigrants and U.S. citizens sponsor family members. The process has spirals out of control until everyone’s cousin is eligible, regardless of professional skills or what they can contribute to this country. Chain immigrations and anchor babies do not bode well for our country’s future but there is little attention given to these matters and their adverse effects on the national interest.
All immigrants, both legal and illegal, as well as their US-born children comprises up to one third of all the uninsured in America. Compared to the native born population, they are twice as likely to be uninsured, and twice as likely to be on Medicaid. That is costing us a bundle already.
In an attempt to partially alleviate the burden chain migration places on social services, the 1996 Welfare Reform Act made some requirements that the sponsors of immigrants be financially responsible for the immigrants. Indeed most welfare programs have some limitations on non-citizens. But under H.R. 3200, new immigrants who are supposed to be supported by a sponsor can get tax-funded healthcare. They can even sponsor more immigrants!
Former Hudson Institute economist Ed Rubenstein estimates that legal immigrants and their children will be responsible for 78 percent of all increased healthcare costs by 2050, totaling 1.2 trillion dollars. Why is the Administration and Congress ignoring this obvious source of healthcare savings as it struggles to justify healthcare reform?
Unlike illegal aliens, anchor babies and legal immigrants did not break any laws. We should not demonize them, but we should not ignore the huge fiscal burden they impose on our already stretched economy.
Fixing our broken healthcare system is not easy, but making some basic changes to our immigration policy is. Securing our borders, enforcing our laws, ending birthright citizenship and chain migration, and reducing our levels of legal immigration; would do much more to lower healthcare costs than any government program.
Before America embarks on healthcare reform, we should either fix these problems in our immigration system, or at least put adequate safeguards to prevent immigrants from receiving even more free benefits at the expense of the US taxpayer.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Followers

About Me

My photo
BA Chemistry MS Public Administration MBA CPA